Trecator SC Dosage Calculator
Enter patient details to calculate the appropriate Trecator SC (ethionamide) dosage and check for potential drug interactions.
Dosage Recommendation:
Drug Interaction Warning:
Trecator SC is a delayed‑release oral formulation of ethionamide used primarily for treating multidrug‑resistant tuberculosis (MDR‑TB). Approved by the FDA in 1999, it delivers ethionamide over a 12‑hour period, aiming to smooth plasma peaks and reduce gastrointestinal irritation.
What makes Ethionamide unique?
Ethionamide belongs to the thioamide class of antimycobacterial agents. Its mechanism of action involves inhibition of the enzyme InhA, a key player in mycolic acid synthesis - the fatty‑acid backbone that gives Mycobacterium tuberculosis its waxy cell wall. By disrupting this process, ethionamide hampers bacterial replication.
Key attributes:
- Drug class: Thioamide
- Standard dose: 15-20 mg/kg daily (max 1g)
- Half‑life: 3-5hours (extended to ~12hours with the SC formulation)
- Common side effects: Nausea, hepatotoxicity, peripheral neuropathy
Because ethionamide is a pro‑drug that requires activation by the bacterial enzyme EthA, resistance can emerge quickly if the ethA gene mutates. This is a pivotal reason why clinicians often pair it with other second‑line drugs.
Where does Trecator SC fit into MDR‑TB therapy?
The World Health Organization (WHO) 2023 treatment guidelines list ethionamide as a GroupB drug - useful when first‑line agents like isoniazid and rifampicin fail, but not the strongest option available. In practice, Trecator SC is usually reserved for regimens that include:
- Fluoroquinolones (e.g., levofloxacin or moxifloxacin)
- Injectable agents (amikacin, capreomycin) - though these are being phased out
- Companion drugs such as cycloserine or PAS
Clinical trials in South Africa and India have shown sputum conversion rates of 65‑70% when ethionamide is incorporated into a 9‑month regimen, compared to 80‑85% for newer agents like bedaquiline.
Alternative drugs to consider
When weighing Trecator SC against newer options, it helps to compare core attributes. Below are brief definitions of the most common alternatives, each marked up for schema extraction.
Bedaquiline is a diarylquinoline that targets the ATP synthase of M.tuberculosis, leading to rapid bacterial death. Approved in 2012, it’s now a cornerstone of all‑oral MDR‑TB regimens.
Delamanid is a nitro‑imidazole that blocks mycolic acid synthesis. It received FDA approval in 2020 and is recommended for patients with fluoroquinolone‑resistant TB.
Fluoroquinolones (e.g., levofloxacin, moxifloxacin) inhibit DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV. They remain GroupA drugs in WHO guidelines because of high efficacy and oral availability.
Cycloserine is a cyclic analog of D‑alanine that interferes with cell‑wall synthesis. It’s often used as a companion drug, despite its neuropsychiatric side‑effect profile.
Para‑aminosalicylic acid (PAS) works by antagonizing folic‑acid metabolism. Though older, it can still add value in highly resistant cases.
Side‑by‑side comparison
Drug | Mechanism | FDA Approval Year | Typical Daily Dose | Sputum Conversion (12‑mo) | Major Side Effects |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Trecator SC (Ethionamide) | InhA inhibition (mycolic‑acid synthesis) | 1999 | 15‑20mg/kg (max 1g) | ~68% | Nausea, hepatotoxicity, peripheral neuropathy |
Bedaquiline | ATP‑synthase inhibition | 2012 | 400mg loading, then 200mg three times/week | ~85% | QT prolongation, hepatotoxicity |
Delamanid | Mycolic‑acid synthesis block | 2020 | 100mg twice daily | ~82% | QT prolongation, dizziness |
Levofloxacin | DNA gyrase inhibition | 1996 (generic) | 750mg daily | ~78% | Tendonitis, QT prolongation |
Cycloserine | D‑alanine analog - cell‑wall synthesis | 1994 (generic) | 500mg twice daily | ~70% | Depression, seizures |

Pros of choosing Trecator SC
- Cost‑effective: Generic ethionamide is substantially cheaper than bedaquiline or delamanid, making it accessible in low‑resource settings.
- Oral administration: No injections required, improving patient adherence.
- Established safety data: Over two decades of real‑world use give clinicians clear monitoring guidelines.
- Synergy with fluoroquinolones: Pharmacodynamic studies show additive bactericidal activity when paired.
Cons and caveats
- Higher toxicity: Gastro‑intestinal upset and liver enzyme elevation occur in up to 30% of patients.
- Resistance risk: Mutations in the ethA activation gene can render ethionamide ineffective within months.
- Slow bactericidal effect: Time to sputum conversion lags behind newer agents, which may prolong isolation periods.
- Drug‑drug interactions: Potent inducer of CYP3A4, potentially lowering levels of concomitant antiretrovirals.
Practical prescribing tips
When you decide to include Trecator SC, follow these steps to minimize adverse events:
- Baseline labs: obtain liver function tests (ALT, AST), renal profile, and baseline ECG.
- Start with a low dose (10mg/kg) for the first 3 days, then titrate up to target dose to gauge tolerance.
- Supplement with pyridoxine (25mg daily) to counteract peripheral neuropathy.
- Monitor liver enzymes every 2weeks for the first two months, then monthly.
- Educate patients about early signs of hepatotoxicity (jaundice, dark urine) and neuro‑symptoms (tingling, weakness).
When to pivot to newer agents
If any of the following arise, consider swapping ethionamide for a newer drug:
- Persistent positive sputum after 8weeks despite adherence.
- ALT/AST rise >3× upper limit of normal.
- Co‑infection with HIV where CYP3A4 induction may compromise antiretroviral efficacy.
- Availability of bedaquiline or delamanid through national TB programs, offering higher cure rates.
Related concepts and next steps
Understanding the broader MDR‑TB landscape helps you make smarter drug choices. Key related topics include:
- Drug susceptibility testing (DST): Phenotypic vs. genotypic methods for detecting ethA mutations.
- WHO treatment guidelines 2023: The recommended all‑oral regimens and the positioning of ethionamide.
- Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modelling: Optimizing dosing intervals for the SC (sustained‑release) formulation.
- Adherence strategies: Directly observed therapy (DOT) vs. digital adherence technologies (DATs).
- Future pipeline: New diarylquinolines and oxazolidinones under investigation.
After reading this guide, you might want to explore detailed dosing calculators for ethionamide or compare the cost‑effectiveness of bedaquiline‑based regimens in your region.

Frequently Asked Questions
Is Trecator SC the same as regular ethionamide?
Trecator SC is a sustained‑release tablet of ethionamide. The active ingredient is identical, but the formulation spreads absorption over 12 hours, which can lessen peak‑related nausea.
When should a clinician switch from ethionamide to bedaquiline?
Switching is advised if sputum remains positive after 8 weeks, if liver enzymes rise above three times the normal limit, or if the patient is on a CYP3A4‑heavy antiretroviral regimen that could be compromised.
What monitoring is required for patients on Trecator SC?
Baseline liver function tests, renal panel, and ECG are essential. Follow‑up liver enzymes every two weeks for the first two months, then monthly. Also, check for peripheral neuropathy and advise pyridoxine supplementation.
Can ethionamide be taken with HIV medications?
Yes, but caution is needed. Ethionamide induces CYP3A4, which can lower concentrations of protease inhibitors and some non‑nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Dose‑adjustments or therapeutic drug monitoring may be required.
How does the efficacy of ethionamide compare to fluoroquinolones?
Fluoroquinolones generally achieve higher sputum conversion rates (~78% vs. ~68%) and have a faster bactericidal onset. However, resistance to fluoroquinolones is rising, making ethionamide a valuable backup.
William Goodwin
September 27, 2025 AT 19:13Reading through the Trecator SC guide feels like opening a portal to a world where pharmacology meets philosophy, and I can’t help but marvel at the interplay of chemistry and human resilience 🌍. The sustained‑release formulation, as the article notes, smooths out the peaks that usually hammer the gut, turning a dreaded nausea episode into a whisper of discomfort. Yet beyond the mechanics, there’s a deeper narrative about equity: many low‑resource settings still wrestle with drug shortages, making every gram of ethionamide a precious commodity. Imagine a clinic in rural India where a nurse must decide whether to allocate Trecator SC or a newer, pricier partner drug – the decision ripples through families, economies, and future generations. 💊 The dosage calculator is a brilliant tool, but it also reminds us that numbers on a screen can’t capture the anxiety of a patient waiting for sputum conversion results. Moreover, the article’s caution about CYP3A4 induction underscores how intertwined TB therapy is with HIV management, demanding a symphony of clinicians to keep the rhythm steady. The mention of bedaquiline and delamanid as alternatives sparks hope, yet it also highlights the stark reality that these drugs, while more effective, remain out of reach for many due to cost and regulatory hurdles. This juxtaposition forces us to ask: are we content to settle for “good enough” when the science hints at better? The piece also touches on adherence strategies, ranging from DOT to digital technologies – a reminder that the battle is not just biochemical but also behavioral. In an era where telemedicine is booming, could a simple SMS reminder boost the success rates of Trecator SC regimens? The future pipeline of diarylquinolines and oxazolidinones looms on the horizon, promising new weapons in our armamentarium, but until they are widely available, clinicians must master the art of using older drugs wisely. Lastly, the ethical dimension cannot be ignored: prescribing a drug that may exacerbate liver enzymes demands a delicate balance between urgency and caution, especially when patients already bear the weight of HIV co‑infection. All in all, this guide is a compass for navigating the intricate landscape of MDR‑TB treatment, and it reminds us that every dosage decision is a moral act as much as a medical one. 🌟
Isha Bansal
September 28, 2025 AT 23:00One must first address the glaring deficiencies in the prose of the aforementioned exposition; the author intersperses colloquialisms amidst otherwise technical discourse, thereby undermining the gravitas required for a subject of such import. Moreover, the failure to delineate the pharmacodynamic nuances between ethionamide and its sustained‑release counterpart is an egregious omission that betrays a lack of scholarly diligence. The article further neglects to provide a comprehensive comparison of MIC values across diverse Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains, an oversight that could mislead practitioners operating in high‑burden locales. It is also imperative to underscore that the recommendation to monitor liver enzymes bi‑weekly overlooks the fact that hepatic toxicity often manifests after a protracted latency, necessitating a more vigilant schedule. In addition, the cursory mention of drug‑drug interactions with antiretrovirals does not suffice; a thorough tabulation of CYP3A4 inducers and inhibitors, complete with dosage adjustment algorithms, is indispensable. The author’s cavalier reference to the WHO 2023 guidelines without explicating the rationale behind the shift towards all‑oral regimens further compounds the article’s inadequacy. Finally, the omission of a cost‑effectiveness analysis renders the guide incomplete for policy‑makers who must allocate scarce resources judiciously. In sum, the piece, while superficially informative, betrays a superficial engagement with the complexities inherent to MDR‑TB management.
Ken Elelegwu
September 30, 2025 AT 02:46Ah, the grand tapestry of anti‑TB pharmacology-one could argue that ethionamide, in its humble sustained‑release guise, is the quiet philosopher of the regimen, pondering its own existence amidst a chorus of louder fluoroquinolones. Yet, while the article paints a picture of utility, it fails to confront the existential dread of resistance that looms like a specter over any monotherapy approach. The subtle art of balancing efficacy with tolerability is akin to a dialectic, where each dose is a thesis and each side effect a antithesis, culminating in a synthesis that is patient adherence. One must also consider the epistemological implications of using a drug that was first synthesized in the mid‑20th century yet remains relevant through clever formulation. It is, in a sense, a testament to the resilience of scientific ingenuity, though some might argue it also reflects the stagnation of R&D pipelines in low‑income settings. In any case, the guide’s emphasis on monitoring-liver enzymes, ECG, neuropathy-serves as a reminder that every pharmacological choice is a pact with the body, demanding both respect and vigilance.
Gene Nilsson
October 1, 2025 AT 06:33In the realm of therapeutic decision‑making, one is beholden to the immutable principles of beneficence and non‑maleficence; thus, the prescriber must eschew any complacency when dosing ethionamide. It is imperative, as the author suggests, to conduct baseline hepatic panels, yet the advisory omits a critical note: the assay's sensitivity must be calibrated to capture subclinical elevations that may presage fulminant failure. Moreover, the frequceny of monitoring-every two weeks initially-should be appraised in the context of resource‑limited environments, where such rigorous testing may be infeasiblle. The discourse would benefit from a more granular stratification of risk based upon comorbid conditions, such as HIV co‑infection or pre‑existing liver disease. Lastly, the claim that Trecator SC "lessens peak‑related nausea" requires substantiation through peer‑reviewed pharmacokinetic data; anecdotal assertions are insufficient for clinical guidance.
Vintage Ireland
October 2, 2025 AT 10:20Hey folks, just wanted to say that this guide really breaks down a lot of the confusion around ethionamide, especially the sustained‑release version. I’ve seen patients struggle with the regular tablets because the nausea hits hard, so the SC form can be a game‑changer. Also, the reminder about checking liver enzymes early on is spot‑on – catching issues before they spiral makes a huge difference. For anyone juggling HIV meds too, the interaction note is a lifesaver; it’s easy to miss those CYP3A4 effects. Overall, great resource for clinicians and patients alike.
Anshul Gupta
October 3, 2025 AT 14:06Sounds like a lot of fluff.
Maryanne robinson
October 4, 2025 AT 17:53Great summary! 👏 Let me add a practical tip: when you start a patient on Trecator SC, it's helpful to schedule their first liver function test at day 14 rather than waiting the full two weeks after baseline. This way, you can catch any early transaminitis and adjust the dose before the patient experiences significant fatigue or abdominal discomfort. Also, don’t forget pyridoxine (vitamin B6) supplementation – it’s essential for preventing peripheral neuropathy, especially in patients with pre‑existing malnutrition. In my clinic, we’ve seen adherence improve dramatically when we provide a simple pamphlet that explains the timing of the sustained‑release tablet (take it with food, preferably breakfast) and the importance of consistent dosing. Lastly, for those co‑treated with antiretrovirals, consider therapeutic drug monitoring if you have access to it; ensuring that protease inhibitor levels stay within therapeutic range can prevent virologic failure. Keep up the good work, and feel free to reach out if you need any more hands‑on advice!
Erika Ponce
October 5, 2025 AT 21:40Nice guide. I think it could use a simple table with the main side effects and how often to check them. That would help busy docs.
Danny de Zayas
October 7, 2025 AT 01:26Interesting read. I’ll keep it in mind.
John Vallee
October 8, 2025 AT 05:13Wow, what a thorough piece! 🎉 I especially appreciate the balanced view on when to switch to bedaquiline – waiting for sputum conversion at 8 weeks is a sensible checkpoint. Just a quick thought: many clinicians forget to counsel patients about the taste changes that can occur with ethionamide, which sometimes leads to non‑adherence. A small tip is to suggest taking the tablet with a flavored yogurt or a smoothie to mask any metallic aftertaste. Also, regarding the drug‑interaction section, it might be useful to list common non‑nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors that are most affected, such as efavirenz, so prescribers can anticipate dose adjustments. Overall, a solid resource for anyone managing MDR‑TB, and the inclusion of monitoring intervals makes it very actionable.
Brian Davis
October 9, 2025 AT 09:00The article does a decent job outlining the pharmacology, but it could benefit from a deeper dive into the comparative efficacy data between ethionamide and newer agents. For instance, recent meta‑analyses suggest that bedaquiline‑containing regimens achieve higher sputum conversion rates within 12 weeks, which is a crucial outcome for public‑health programs aiming to reduce transmission. Additionally, while the sustained‑release formulation may improve tolerability, the cost‑effectiveness analysis is missing – many low‑income settings may not afford the SC version, opting instead for the standard tablet despite its side‑effect profile. Including a decision‑tree algorithm that incorporates factors such as HIV co‑infection, liver function status, and drug‑availability would make the guide far more practical for frontline clinicians.
jenni williams
October 10, 2025 AT 12:46Hey! This was super helpful 😊 Just wanted to say that if you’re worried about the nausea, try taking the Trecator SC with a big breakfast – it really helps my stomach. Also, don’t forget to keep a diary of any side effects; it makes talking to your doc so much easier. Stay strong!